Economic Evaluations of Anti-obesity Interventions in Obese Adults: An Umbrella Review.

This umbrella review amalgamates the outcomes of economic evaluations pertaining to bariatric surgeries, pharmacotherapy, and gastric balloon for adult obesity treatment. Six databases were systematically searched. The inclusion criteria were established following the Patient/population Intervention Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) statement. Fifteen reviews met all the inclusion criteria. Eight studies focused on surgical interventions, four on pharmacotherapy, and three on both interventions. No systematic review of the economic evaluation of gastric balloons was identified. The majority of reviews advocated bariatric surgery as a cost-effective approach; however, there was discordance in the interpretation of pharmacological cost-effectiveness. Most of the economic evaluations were conducted from the payer and the healthcare system perspectives. We propose that future economic evaluations assessing weight loss interventions in adults adopt a societal perspective and longer-term time horizons.

Evaluating the affordability of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cystic fibrosis medicines in a middle-income country.

BACKGROUND: A heavy financial burden is imposed on patients suffering from chronic diseases due to medicine out-of-pocket payments. OBJECTIVES: This study focuses on assessing the affordability of medications used for chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cystic fibrosis (CF) in Iran, specifically on the category R medicines listed in the 2017 Iran drug list (IDL) that are used for the treatment of these diseases, based on the anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) drug code. METHODS: The affordability of medicines in mono and combination therapy approaches was assessed in CRDs using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. Accordingly, if out-of-pocket payment for 30-days of pharmacotherapy exceeds one day for the lowest-paid unskilled government worker (LPGW), it's considered non-affordable. RESULTS: Based on the monotherapy approach, our finding demonstrates that all generic medicines of category R were affordable. However, branded drugs such as Symbicort®, Pulmicort Respules®, Flusalmex®, Seretide®, Fluticort Plus®, Seroflo®, and Salmeflo® cost between 1.2 and 2.5 days' wage of LPGW and considered unaffordable despite 70% insurance coverage. Moreover, based on the affordability ratio in the combination therapy approach, all medicines used in asthma, COPD, and CF patients with mild respiratory problems are affordable except omalizumab (inj), which is non-affordable due to its high price and no insurance coverage. CONCLUSION: Results showed that the existing insurance coverage does not protect households from hardship, so more considerations are needed such as different insurance schedules and patient support programs.

Exploring health seeking behaviors for common cold management.

Background: The prevalence of common cold can impose financial burden on the healthcare systems, despite its simple and self-limiting symptoms. Objective: This study examines the behavior of patients suffering from symptoms of the common cold and explores the factors that may influence such behaviors. Methods: A descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019, in Tehran, Iran, using cluster sampling in socioeconomically diverse areas within the city. The participants' behaviors and related factors were evaluated using a 10-item questionnaire. Data collection process involved selecting 5 shopping centers and 404 individuals participated the study. SPSS version 24 was used for analysis. Results: The results showed that 42.1% of the respondents would consult a physician immediately upon experiencing cold symptoms, while 11.4% would consult a pharmacist.In addition, 14.3% would try self-medication, 28.3% relied on traditional home remedies, and 15%indicated not to make use of any remedies or interventions. The study indicated a correlation between people's behaviors concerning the common cold and their level of health self-confidence, knowledge of the common cold, lifestyle, gender, marital status, occupational status, insurance status, and average family spending. Conclusion: The findings of this study are significant in that they shed light on the behaviors of individuals and associated factors related to seeking medical assistance for the common cold. This knowledge can assist healthcare systems in developing strategies aimed at enhancing treatment outcomes, and decreasing costs.

How does external reference pricing work in developing countries: evidence from Iran.

Introduction: Governments apply different pricing policies to ensure public accessibility, availability, and affordability of medicines. In this way, external reference pricing (ERP) because of its easy implementation is used widely across countries. However, ERP is completely path dependent, and it would both bring pros and cons, related to its implementing strategy which makes understanding of its impact in different countries challenging. In this study, we examine the performance of the ERP approach in Iran as a pricing tool. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study. Although Iran officially uses a reference country basket for ERP, in this study, we use different reference countries based on socioeconomic comparability, access to their price data, medicine pricing approaches, and pharmaceutical expenditure to examine the effect of reference countries as well as the method performance. Then, an empirical study was applied to a list of selected samples of medicines in the Iranian market to compare their price with our new reference countries. Then, we discuss the performance of ERP process based on the real prices in the Iranian pharmaceutical market. Result: The prices of 57 medicines, which contain about 69.2% of the imported Iran pharma market in value, were compared with their prices in selected reference countries. It was found that 49.1% of prices were more expensive in at least one of the reference countries, and in 21% of products, the average price in Iran was higher than the average price in reference countries. Conclusion: Achieving efficient and fair pricing of pharmaceuticals between and within countries is still a complex conceptual and policy problem that ERP in short term can handle. ERP cannot be considered a perfect tool for pricing alone, although its effectiveness is acceptable. It is expected that using other pricing methods alongside the ERP will improve patients' access to medicines. In Iran, we use value base pricing as the main pricing method for every new molecule. Then, we use other methods such as ERP as a complementary method.

Main drivers of diabetes pharmaceuticals expenditures: evidence from OECD countries and Iran.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the impact of prominent drivers on drug expenditure for diabetes. Method: Following the examination of previous studies, this study identified possible factors contributing to diabetes pharmaceutical expenditures. The explanatory variables for the study were the median population age, access to innovative drugs, GDP per capita, prevalence, price, and consumption of diabetes drugs. Then, to estimate the per capita expenditure among diabetic patients, this study developed the panel data model and two time-series regression models for OECD countries and Iran, respectively. Results: In the panel data regression model, R2 was 0.43. The influence of the age, prevalence, consumption volume and GDP per capita coefficients were + 1.79, + 0.704, + 3.86057, + 0.00054, respectively. Also, the probability level of all variables was less than 0.05. In Iran's comparative time-series regression model, R2 was 0.9, and the only significant influence coefficient was the age (ß=+0.91). In the another model for Iran, R2 was 0.99, the influence coefficient of age was + 0.249, the prevalence was + 0.131, innovation was + 0.029, and the price was + 0.00054; all the probability levels were less than 0.05. Conclusion: Pharmaceutical per capita expenditure is affected by several factors. These factors are not the same in various counties. Passing a judgment on drug utilization only based on pharmaceutical per capita expenditure cannot be perfect. Also, judging whether the per capita drug expenditure in one country is desirable without attention to the affecting factors and only relying on the value of utilized medicines is defective.

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Adding Cetuximab to the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma in Iran; Considering Genetic Screening for Precision Medicine.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in different genetic populations of metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients, including KRAS and RAS wild types and mutants, when added to FOLFIRI treatment regimens for evidence-based disease management in Iran. METHOD: A Markov decision model was designed in TreeAge software with the three states of stable, progress, and death. Clinical outcomes were extracted from published clinical studies, and costs were extracted from the Iranian local data. The primary outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in the simulated population. RESULTS: The cost-utility model from the perspective of the health system indicated that the average direct medical costs of a patient that has not been genetically screened are $56,985.27 and $20,767.74 in FOLFIRI + cetuximab and FOLFIRI regimens, respectively. However, costs per patient in the KRAS wild-type population were $21,845.52 in FOLFIRI and $78,321.22 in FOLFIRI + cetuximab. In RAS wild-type patients, FOLFIRI and FOLFIRI + cetuximab costs per patient were $23,111.62 and $84,976.39, respectively. Incremental QALYs for the above scenarios were 0.069, 0.193, and 0.285, respectively. Therefore, the ICER of add-on cetuximab in Iran compared to the treatment alternatives in the scenarios with and without KRAS screening was $520,771.55/QALY, $292,768.16/QALY, and $217,460.51/QALY. CONCLUSION: Although genetic screening in precision medicine reduces costs per outcome, according to the willingness-to-pay threshold of $4349.50 in the Iranian health system, add-on cetuximab to the FOLFIRI regimen is not a cost-effective strategy even with genetic screening and a 20% price reduction.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Macitentan in Comparison With Bosentan in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Iran.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic and progressive disease that, if left untreated, shortens the life expectancy of patients. Endothelin receptor antagonists, such as macitentan and bosentan, play an essential role in improving the patient's symptoms, quality of life, and life expectancy. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of macitentan compared with bosentan in treating PAH from the health system perspective in Iran. METHODS: For evaluating the cost-effectiveness of macitentan, a Markov model consisting of 5 states, functional class (FC) I, FC II, FC III, FC IV, and death, was designed using the TreeAge software. The lifetime time horizon and a 3-month cycle length were set. Patients entered the model from FC II or FC III states based on the initial probabilities. Costs were measured in US dollars (USD), and outcomes were measured in terms of quality quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Consequently, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. In addition, sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the robustness of the model by examining the possible effects of uncertainties on the final result. RESULTS: The costs of treatment with macitentan and bosentan in PAH in Iran were calculated at 19 429 and 17 246 USD, and the outcomes were 4.02 and 3.04 QALYs, respectively. Therefore, ICER was calculated at 2233.46 USD/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the model is robust; nevertheless, it is most sensitive to the price of macitentan and bosentan. CONCLUSION: Treatment with macitentan was associated with both higher costs and QALYs than bosentan. Nevertheless, it is considered the cost-effective treatment strategy in Iran given that the calculated ICER falls below the willingness to pay threshold.

The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification on Sustainable Human Resources Management and Organizational Citizenship Behavior's Relationship.

Background: There is a general theme in studying employees in the research and development (R&D) department individual performance studies, where tremendous attention has been paid to innovation performance compared to behavioral and particularly extra-role behavior of employees in this department. Objectives: This study investigates the relationship between sustainable human resource management (s-HRM) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) through the mediating role of organizational identification (OI) in R&D employees. Methods: A standard questionnaire was used to evaluate s-HRM, OI, and OCB. Five hundred questionnaires were delivered to all employees of the research and development departments of 59 Iranian pharmaceutical companies, and finally, 316 completed questionnaires were collected. Results: The results of data analysis with WarpPls software revealed a positive and significant relationship between s-HRM and OI, as well as OI and OCB. Investigating the mediating role of OI showed that OI partially mediates the relationship between s-HRM and OCB. The model was checked in terms of its fit indices, which were evaluated as favorable. Conclusions: The findings suggest that s-HRM improves employees' willingness to go beyond their defined job description to display in OCB. Additionally, they imply that strengthening OI can improve OCB in employees.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to systematically review published economic studies to determine whether dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitor, plus standard care therapy (SCT) is cost-effective in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHOD: We searched relevant keywords in PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and Google Scholar to find related articles. Costs, QALYs, ICERs were extracted from eligible studies. RESULTS: Ten studies finally included in the systematic review. The results of quality assessment of the study showed that a reasonable quality of all studies. Incremental QALYs were in favor of dapagliflozin plus SCT treatment regimen. In all the studies, the incremental costs per QALY was below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold with the exception of one study in United Kingdom which the ICER and WTP were $83,650 and $50,000. All the studies determined the National Health Care perspective. The highest and lowest ICERs were $83,650 and $1991 per QALY in United Kingdom and Thailand, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of cost-effectiveness analyses showed that adjunct dapagliflozin plus SCT is cost-effective compared to SCT alone despite the additional costs of the drug. Finally it can be concluded that dapagliflozin is a worldwide cost-effective as an adjunct medicine in HFrEF management.

The cost of dispensing errors in Iranian health system: a retrospective evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The problem of medication errors (MEs) has constantly been receiving considerable attention worldwide due to their health impact and costly consequences. MEs occur in all phases of prescription, preparation, administration, distribution and delivery to the patient; however, dispensing errors are more common in this study, we have attempted to identify various MEs that occurred by pharmacists and calculate their financial and physical harm costs. DESIGN: This was a 8-year retrospective study. SETTING: This study evaluated the costs of MEs in the Iranian health system caused by dispensing mistakes from 2012 to 2019. We retrieved documents and reports from the Tehran Medical Council Archive. Then, we extracted dispensing error data from ME record forms and analyzed them using SPSS software. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost of dispensing errors. RESULTS: Among 3000 available MEs documents, only 2.6% of cases were dispensing errors. Errors included dispensing of wrong medication (75.6%), delivering expired medicines (11.5%), wrong medication order (9%), wrong medicine compounding (2.6%) and wrong dose of medication (1.3%). The most common cause of dispensing errors was physicians' poor handwriting (23.1%). Legal reactions, due to MEs, occurred in a range of actions from written reprimand in the professional records to some months of deprivation from professional activities. CONCLUSION: The analysis of the MEs that lead to the legal prosecution in the Iranian Medical Council shows that most cases, according to the severity of harm, were dispensing wrong medicines which caused temporary patients harm.

How Do Iranian Stakeholders Think About Pharmaceutical Managed Entry Agreements?

Background: Uncertainty in real-world product profiles is the main barrier to pharmaceutical market access. Managed entry agreements (MEAs) are the formal arrangements to overcome these uncertainties. Despite the extensive experience of developed countries in implementing such agreements, the experience of developing countries is minimal. As health decision-makers in Iran have moved towards implementing MEAs since 2020, seeking stakeholders' insights is crucial for filling this experience gap and facilitating the optimal implementation of these new policies. Methods: Our research was done in three phases: (1) Focus group interviews to disclose the main objectives of implementing MEAs in Iran, (2) the AHP approach to prioritize uncertainties, and (3) individual semi-structured interviews to carry out strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. Results: Based on our stakeholders' views, increasing flexibility in improving patients' access to innovative and expensive drugs and responding to budget impact uncertainty seems highly prioritized for conducting MEAs in Iran. The SWOT analysis showed that although MEAs have the chance for success due to their strengths and opportunities, such as providing early and assured access, allocating resources efficiently, and enhancing the efficiency of post-marketing studies, policymakers should consider the weaknesses and threats such as difficulty in defining outcomes, high transaction cost, and lack of suitable infrastructure to increase the success rate. Conclusions: Efficient implementation of MEAs depends on the weaknesses and threats and considering the views of relevant stakeholders. Constructive interaction among all stakeholders is essential for adequately executing MEAs.

Cost-Effectiveness of Dulaglutide Versus Liraglutide for Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Iran.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes mellitus (DM), as one of the most common metabolic diseases, is the ninth leading cause of death globally and imposes heavy costs on the health systems including both costs of treatment and management of secondary complications. This study intended to investigate the cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide compared with liraglutide in the management of patients with type 2 DM in Iran. METHOD: We conducted a cost-utility analysis using a 5-state Markov model from the health system perspective, over a 10-year time horizon, in 2018 in Iran. Sensitivity of the model has been evaluated through tornado diagram and using one-way sensitivity analysis. In addition, probabilistic sensitivity analysis has been accomplished using Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The average costs of treatment of patients with type 2 DM using the dulaglutide and liraglutide treatment regimens are 17 577.09 and 18 517.54 US dollars per patient, respectively, over a 10-year time horizon. In terms of effectiveness, the average discounted quality-adjusted life-year rates are estimated at 5.560 and 5.403 for the dulaglutide and liraglutide treatment regimens, respectively. The model is mostly sensitive to the price of dulaglutide and liraglutide, the hemoglobin A1c reduction of liraglutide, and the utility resulting from less injection frequency of dulaglutide, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dulaglutide, in addition to being more effective, providing 0.156 more quality-adjusted life-years for the patients, reduces costs by 940.45 US dollars per patient over a 10-year time horizon. Therefore, due to the greater effectiveness and lower cost, it is concludable that dulaglutide is the cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = -6028.52) treatment alternative from the health system perspective.

Cost-effectiveness evaluation of mirabegron versus anti-muscarinics and third-line therapies: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) is defined as urinary urgency, usually with urinary frequency and nocturia. . The current treatment for OAB includes conservative management, surgery, and pharmacotherapy. Mirabegron is a new drug acting by the ß3-adrenoceptor agonism. This study aimed to review the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron in the treatment of OAB. AREAS COVERED: We searched published articles in electronic search databases. Ten studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Various antimuscarinics, including oxybutynin, fesoterodine, tolterodine, darifenacin, and trospium were compared with mirabegron. The results were evaluated and compared according to the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), cost/year, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Of the ten studies in only three, mirabegron was not a cost-effective strategy. In seven cases, mirabegron was cost-effective. EXPERT OPINION: The cost-effectiveness of mirabegron was variable in different regions; however, most of the studies show the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron. Our study illustrates that mirabegron's ICER in comparison with its comparators is below the willingness to pay threshold even in the countries with low GDP/Capita. Our proposal for future economic studies for OAB pharmacotherapy is to compare different doses, formulations, and administration forms in a real-world context.

A ten-year study of anti-diabetic drugs utilization in Iran.

Objectives: According to the world health organization (WHO), by the year 2030 diabetes will become the world's seventh leading cause of death. This study aimed to design and conduct a descriptive pharmacoepidemiological investigation of anti-diabetic drugs utilization during a ten-year period using the anatomical therapeutic classification/defined daily dose (ATC / DDD) system in Iran. Methods: Based on pharmaceutical wholesalers' sale reports, sale data, including value and volume, were retrieved from the Iranian Annual Pharma Statistics for 2009-2018. The ATC/DDD system was used to standardize the raw sales data. Anti-diabetic drug utilization was reported as DDD per 1000 person in the population per day. Expenditure was calculated as USD per DDD. Results were then analyzed descriptively. Results: During the ten-year study period, total anti-diabetic drug consumption increased by 235.53%. Insulin utilization grew by 148.65%, whereas non-insulin agents' use showed a 132.68% increase. Anti-diabetic drugs' expenditure increased by almost 9-fold, but changes were accompanied with many fluctuations. Although the absolute expenditure of almost all classes of anti-diabetic drugs were increasing, this growth was greater in biguanides, which only includes metformin in Iran. Approximately one-third of anti-diabetic drugs expenditures were related to fast-acting insulins. Imported drugs share in cost was significant, but not in consumption. The overall share of insulin consumption was less than 19%, but their share of total value reached 60% of the anti-diabetic market. Conclusions: The growing trend in both insulin and non-insulin anti-diabetic drugs utilization is a substantial issue for health authorities' policy making for sustainable access to medicine.

An investigation into the pharmaceutical advertising in Iranian medical journals.

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical advertising is not only considered a key factor in the successful launch of pharmaceutical products, but is also an important source of public health information with a significant impact on consumer choice and behavior. Nowadays, advertising has become the broadest dissemination channel for various products, including medicines, which may ultimately lead to the generalization of self-treatment or mistreatment. Improper drug promotion can exacerbate unhealthy outcomes by making false or misleading claims, using inferior references, and failing to meet international standards. This study aimed to examine the requirements for pharmaceutical advertising from regulatory perspective and the compliance of Iranian pharmaceutical advertisements to related standards and guidelines. It is limited to print advertisements in Iranian national medical journals and magazines. METHOD: The present study is a descriptive-analytical study using bibliometric methods. As a first step, a comprehensive review of the national and international regulations on drug advertising was conducted and a comparison of different regulations was provided. In the second step, a checklist was created to evaluate the compliance of drug advertising with the extracted regulations. RESULT: The results of the present study show that the claims made in Iranian drug advertisements are 29.10% valid, 27.67% exaggerated, 23.10% controversial, 12.62% misleading, and 6.8% invalid. In general, we found that most medical advertisements in Iranian journals and magazines comply with national laws and regulations. However, many international requirements are not met in these advertisements. CONCLUSIONS: Although we found that printed medical advertisements in Iran are roughly compliant with national regulations, there is still a long way to achieve full compliance. Monitoring processes should be improved and clearly defined penalties should be set to avoid misleading claims and their likely health consequences. It is very important in Iran to update the existing rules and regulations for medical advertisements according to international guidelines. More careful monitoring of the content of advertising and the accuracy of claims are also needed.

Investigation the determinants of pharmaceutical expenditure share of GDP in Iran and selected OECD countries.

AIM: This study estimated the GDP share of pharmaceuticals in Iran based on the drivers of pharmaceutical expenditure and compared it with that of 31 members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). SUBJECT AND METHODS: The factors contributing to pharmaceutical expenditure were identified through literature review and studied by 8 experts to classify the factors. Then, using the panel data method, a model was built to estimate the GDP share of pharmaceutical expenditure based on the extracted factors of the selected countries in Iran's model. To explain the observed differences, several regression analyses were performed based on cross-sectional data. The analyses were performed using EVIEWS software, version 10. RESULTS: The explanatory variables for the selected countries in the panel model (R2 = 0.98) were specified. Government health expenditure (ß = 0.1432), the share of generic drugs (ß = - 0.0143), gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (ß = - 0.0058) and the rate of disability-adjusted life-years (DALY) (ß = 0.0028) contributed most to pharmaceutical expenditure. In comparison, in the Iranian estimation model (R2 = 0.84), government health expenditure (ß = 0.0536) and the share of generic drugs (ß = 0.0369) had a significant impact on pharmaceutical expenditure. In the estimation model with more estimators for Iran (R2 = 0.99), government health expenditure (ß = 0.1694), disease prevalence (ß = 0.0537), the share of generic drugs (ß = 0.0102), the DALY rate (ß = 0.0039), GDP per capita (ß = - 0.0033), and the drug price index (ß = 0.0007) contribute most to pharmaceutical expenditure. CONCLUSION: In the models of the study, factors related to the structure of the healthcare system and the pharmaceutical system contributed most to pharmaceutical expenditure as a share of GDP. Moreover, disease profiles show its predictive role in the second model for Iran.

How Much Iranian Parents Know of and How Well They Practice Regarding Antibiotics?

Irrational use of antibiotics as a global health concern has led to excessive treatment costs, failure of treatments, and antimicrobial resistance. Parents' knowledge of and practice regarding antibiotics are two important factors contributing to the (ir) rational use of antibiotics. This study aimed to evaluate ill children's parents' knowledge and practice of prescribed antibiotics. Our subjects included only parents with children up to 12 (inclusive) years of age in Tehran, Iran's capital. A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted at 203 health care centers in Tehran. Parents' knowledge was evaluated using a 37-item researcher-made questionnaire, and their practice about antibiotics was measured with a self-stated questionnaire, followed by an observational method to gain a real insight into their practice. SPSS 22 was used to analyze the data. A total of 401 randomly selected parents were enrolled in the study. The average score of parents' knowledge of antibiotics regarding administration, indications, storage, and antimicrobial resistance was found to be 9.72 out of 17.00. In the self-stated method, an appropriate practice of antibiotic use was reported in 49.4% of participants who also got an average score of 3.95 points out of a total 8. In the observational method, most parents' practice (68.4%) regarding antibiotic use was found to be acceptable; their average score was 5.93 points out of a total of 10. The findings of this study showed that half of the parents had adopted an acceptable practice regarding antibiotic use.

Impact of the Trade-Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement on Pharmaceutical Industry in Developing Countries: A Scoping Review.

Pharmaceutical companies in developing countries are heavily influenced by the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement and economic liberalization rules. To adjust to the new patent regime, pharmaceutical companies had to adopt some strategies. A systematic review was conducted on the experiences of the pharmaceutical industry in developing countries and strategies adopted by local pharmaceutical companies to survive after the TRIPS agreement. Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest databases were searched, and twenty-five papers were reviewed. The pharmaceutical industry experiences have been classified into successful and unsuccessful experiences based on criteria developed by the authors. Firm strategies were also divided into four categories based on external and internal factors: aggressive, conservative, competitive, and defensive strategies. Companies were able to survive and even grow after the TRIPS agreement by rebuilding their structures, improving their competencies, and adopting appropriate strategies in line with the new conditions.

The Effect of Organizational Resilience and Strategic Foresight on Firm Performance: Competitive Advantage as Mediating Variable.

The pharmaceutical industry's performance in the global economy has been affected by the growing competition associated with globalization, economic liberalization, and the trade-related aspect of the intellectual property rights (TRIPS) agreement. To maintain performance, organizations need to consider strategic foresight (SF) and organizational resilience (OR) to anticipate future trends and survive crises. By proposing a conceptual framework, this study examines the relationship between organizational resilience, strategic foresight, competitive advantage (CA), and firm performance (FP). A conceptual framework was developed to assess the hypotheses in the pharmaceutical industry. Then, partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to investigate the relationships quantitatively. The results of structural equation modeling (SEM) based on the data generated from 202 completed questionnaires by the pharmaceutical companies in Iran demonstrate that OR, SF, and CA have significant positive impacts on FP. Moreover, CA partially mediates the relationship between OR and FP and also between SF and FP. The findings of this study enrich the existing literature by demonstrating that early detection of environmental change and resilient manner assist Iranian pharmaceutical firms to survive if joining the WTO. This is the first study that examines the direct and indirect effect of OR and SF on the FP, considering the mediating impact of CA. This investigation attempts to address the mechanisms through which OR and SF affect organizational performance, especially in the pharmaceutical industry.

Evaluation of efficiency enhancement in Iran Health Insurance Organization: a policy brief for pharmaceutical cost containment.

BACKGROUND: Rapid increasing pharmaceutical spending on the one hand and limited budgets on the other hand are problems confronting health expenditure. Policymakers have realized that without the negative effect on quality of care, they can control pharmaceutical spending. METHODS: The study methodology involved a targeted review of the literature on cost containment policies, their implementation issues, advantages, and disadvantages. Then, all proposed strategies were investigated through interviewing insurance experts. Finally, these policies were prioritized with respect to their adherence to the main issues of performance. RESULTS: Considering implementation costs, durability, and feasibility, six policy options have been proposed as follows: stopping non-prescription medicine reimbursement, using a tiered-coinsurance mechanism, establishing prescription-guidelines, implementing cost-effectiveness-studies, employing scientific bargaining methods, and using different levels of reference pricing. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the possibility of some physicians' resistance, preparing prescription guidelines and their gradual enforcement is considered as the first choice. Next, it seems that reference pricing is the most feasible policy. It is in spite of some confusion and dissatisfaction, which might arise due to lack of knowledge and an increase in out-of-pocket expenses. Then, all pricing methods, including cost-effectiveness studies and internal and external reference pricing, should be used as negotiation leverage with pharmaceutical companies. Afterward, stopping non-prescription medicine reimbursement should be implemented by good media communication in view of its effects on a wide range of population. Finally, implementation of tiered-coinsurance mechanism should be considered with special attention to some inherent technical complexity.